We're sorry. An error has occurred
Please cancel or retry.
Transforming Process Theism
Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
Couldn't load pickup availability
- Format:
-
26 May 2000

Traces variations of theism in Whitehead's principle works, identifying a major problem in conventional understanding of process theism and constructing an original and provocative solution.
Process theism, in a variety of manifestations and modifications stemming from Whitehead's original suggestions, dominates discussions of philosophical and natural theology in Europe and America. In Transforming Process Theism Ford argues that subsequent modifications of Whitehead's original line of thought mask a fundamental and unresolved aporia in that original proposal: since only past or "objectified" determinate events can influence present experiences and since God, as conceived by Whitehead, is never fully determinate or objectifiable as a "past event," it is difficult to see how this divine persuasive power can have any influence on the present as a source of creativity and genuinely new possibilities for enactment.
Ford meticulously reconstructs and evaluates Whitehead's own versions of theism, and he critically appraises the most influential subsequent modifications of these unrecognized variants by other process thinkers. He recovers the original trajectory of Whitehead's continuous revision of his conception of God, and forges an appropriate solution to this central aporia. He concludes that-consistent with Whitehead's overarching metaphysical principles, there is another kind of causal influence that does not require objectification, and is the opposite of past determinateness. The future, conceived as active, offers an account of subjectivity which is both universal and transcendent. God, according to Ford's revisions, must be understood as this particular but indefinite creativity or universal activity of the future, bestowing subjectivity on each present occasion of experience without ever becoming determinate.
"This book will likely prove most helpful to persons who have first studied Whitehead." — CHOICE
"An important book." — David Ray Griffin, editor of Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time
"If Ford's vision carries the day, all future authors in process philosophy and theology will have to take account of this book." — C. Robert Mesle, author of Process Theology: A Basic Introduction
"Any philosopher who has read seriously in Whitehead's metaphysics will need to buy Ford's book." — George Allan, author of Realizations of the Future
Foreword
Preface
Abbreviations
Introduction
The Intelligibility of Future Activity
I. Meanings of the Future Appropriate to God
1. Meanings of the FutureII. Three Ways Whitehead Revises Traditional Expectations
2. Ways in Which God Is Future
3. Ways in Which God Is Not Future
1. Divine Persuasion Replaces Classical OmnipotenceIII. Toward a New Conception of the Future
2. God Need Not Be Conceived as Creator Ex Nihilo
3. Becoming Is Primary; Being Is Derivative
1. Modes of ActualityIV. The Plan of This Book
2. The Future as Actually Indeterminate
3. The Future as the Source of Creativity
4. The Future as the Source of Aim
5. The Nature of the Future as Actual
Part One
Whitehead's Successive Concepts of God
Chapter One: The Principle of Limitation
I. BackgroundChapter Two: Deconstructing Theism
II. Criticisms
III. Types of Limitation
I. IntroductionChapter Three: Reconstructing Nontemporal Theism
II. The Final Concept: God as Temporal and Concrescent
III. The Middle Concept: God as Nontemporal and Concrescent
IV The Early Concept
I. A Comparison of Concepts
1. The Initial, Minimal ConceptII. Possible Solutions to the Riddle
2. The Final Concept
3. The Middle Concept
1. Natural and Experiential TheologyIII. A Possible External Influence
2. The Role of Religion
3. Temporalist Implications
1. Henry Nelson WiemanIV. The Initial Concept of God
2. Whitehead's Reaction
1. Actual EntityV. The 1926 Metaphysical Principles
2. Transcendence
3. Self-Causation
4. Instance of Creativity
5. The Ontological Principle
1. The Principle of SolidarityVI. The 1927 Metaphysical Principles
2. The Principle of Creative Individuality
3. The Principle of Efficient Causation
4. The Ontological Principle
5. The Principle of Esthetic Individuality
6. The Principle of Ideal Comparison
VII. The Middle Concept of God
1. Preconditions for the Middle ConceptChapter Four: Reconstructing Process Theism
2. Precipitating Factors
I. Preliminary Considerations
1. Exemplifying the Metaphysical PrinciplesII. Precipitating Factors
2. Nontemporal Subjectivity
1. Temporal SubjectivityIII. Whitehead's Problematic Legacy
2. Locus of Integration
3. Is 'Consciousness' the Reason for Process Theism?
4. Is 'Everlastingness' the Reason for Process Theism?
5. What about the Provision of Subjective Aim?
6. The Intensification of Process
1. How God Affects the WorldPart Two
2. The Fourth Phase
3. Apparent Responsiveness and Nontemporal Valuation
4. Later Writings
The Search for the Prehensibility of God
Chapter Five: The Divine Power in the Present
I. William A. Christian
II. Marjorie Suchocki
III. Palmyre Oomen
IV. Jorge Nobo
V. Elizabeth M. Kraus
VI. Lewis S. Ford
Chapter Six: The Power of the Past
I. Nancy Frankenberry and the Power of the Past
II. Hartshorne and the Objectification of God
1. The Principle of PrehensionChapter Seven: Process Nontemporality
2. Objections Based on Hartshorne's Own Position
Objection 13. Divine Occasions with Initial Aims
Divine Occasions are Exceptions to the Metaphysical Principles
Objection 2
Alternation and Asychronicity
Objection 3
Divine Occasions Are Not Persuasive
Objection 4
Divine Occasions Limit Creaturely Freedom
Objection 5
It Undercuts Nontemporal Subjectivity
Objection 6
How Is Creativity Transmitted within God?
Objection 7
How Can the Initial Aims Be Selected?
Objection 8
Eternal Objects Become Everlasting
Objection 9
An Objection from Mathematics
4. The Objection from Relativity Physics
I.Bowman Clarke
II. Uncreated Eternal Objects
III. The Metaphysical Principles
IV Nontemporal Decision and Determination
Part III
The Imprehensibility of God
Chapter Eight: The Power of the Future
I. God and Future Creativity: Some Preliminary Objections
1. God and CreativityII. The Identification of God with Future Creativity
2. God and Being
3. God and Eternity
4. God As Future Actuality
5. God As Becoming
1. God As PersonalIII. The Infusion of Creativity
2. Divine Responsiveness
3. Perfect Power
4. God as Empty
1. Modes of ActualityChapter Nine: Persistence and the Extensive Continuum
2. Prehension and the Infusion of Creativity
3. Aim
4. The Interdependence of Creativity and Aim
I. Persistence and Perception
1. DiremptionII. The Extensive Continuum
2 Emergence of Persistence
3. Atrophy
4. Inclusive Occasions
5. Physical Perception and Prehension
6. Future Physical Perception
7. Divine Consciousness
1. The Ontological Status of the Extensive ContinuumChapter Ten: Creativity and Contingency
2. The Extensive Continuum and Societies
3. Relativity Physics
4. In Unison of Becoming
5. The Locus of all Locations
6. Locus and Passage
7. Divine Privacy and Publicity
I. Creativity
1. Present and Future CreativityII. Contingency
2. Eschatological Actuality
1. Contingency and InterdependenceIII. Concluding Objections
2. Rationalist and Empiricist Process Theology
3. Uniqueness and Primacy
4. Divine Satisfaction
Objection 1
If God Is Future Creativity, How Can God Also Be Personal and Individual?
Objection 2
Is My Claim That Creativity Is Derived from God, Too Much Biased in the Direction of Western Monotheism?
Objection 3
Isn't It Blasphemous to Suppose That Our Own Subjectivity Is Simply a Continuation of God's? Isn't This Simply a Kind of Temporalistic Pantheism?
Objection 4
Does Not the Ontotheological Stricture Exclude the Possibility of God as Future Creativity?
Notes
Index