Skip to product information
1 of 1

Toeing the Line

Regular price £22.00
Sale price £22.00 Regular price £22.00
Sale Sold out
The first up-close look at how Supreme Court affirmative action rulings approximated America’s racial politics between 1978 and 2023.Toeing the Line takes us on the first ever deep dive into the co...
Read More
  • Format:
  • 01 February 2026
View Product Details

The first up-close look at how Supreme Court affirmative action rulings approximated America’s racial politics between 1978 and 2023.

Toeing the Line takes us on the first ever deep dive into the constitutional arguments behind Students for Fair Admissions (2023) and how those arguments mirror public preferences. The wealth of data analyzed in the book demonstrates that justices of the Supreme Court wrestle with the same questions about race that preoccupy the body politic. They reason through these emotionally charged matters the same as the rest of us. And they arrive at the same conclusions. Does the history of slavery and racial exclusion still matter today? Are racial disparities explained by discrimination or something else? How do we reconcile racial preferences with individualist and civil rights ideals? Should blacks simply pull themselves up by their own bootstraps the same as Irish, Italian, and Jewish Americans? A majority of Americans, the Democratic and Republican Parties, and presidents from FDR to Biden arrive at the same answers to these questions as the Supreme Court. Hence, affirmative action rulings from 1978 through 2023 are a case of the Supreme Court toeing the line of America's national racial politics.

files/i.png Icon
Price: £22.00
Pages: 352
Publisher: State University of New York Press
Imprint: SUNY Press
Series: SUNY series in American Constitutionalism
Publication Date: 01 February 2026
Trim Size: 9.00 X 6.00 in
ISBN: 9798855805567
Format: Paperback
BISACs:

REVIEWS Icon

"Toeing the Line offers an up-to-date analysis of all the affirmative action cases and places them in the context of not only judicial precedent but also public opinion, political party positions, and the presidency. The main argument—that the Court has been inconsistent and unhelpful in its approach to affirmative action, but so have the public, political parties, and presidents—is new and thought-provoking." — Charles C. Turner, California State University, Chico