We're sorry. An error has occurred
Please cancel or retry.
Transforming agriculture and food systems for a sustainable and just agroecological future
Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
- Format:
-
30 October 2026

This chapter describes the development and consequences of agricultural intensification and explains key forces that sustain industrial agriculture, despite its many, well-documented harms. We then define transition and transformation toward agroecology, drawing on conceptual frameworks from systems thinking and the social sciences. We argue that combining the ecological and social science dimensions of agroecology is central to advancing transitions and scaling them to larger food systems, especially drawing on insights from the perspective of political ecology. Political ecology seeks to understand underlying power dynamics, and values, goals, and beliefs of actors in a system, which is essential for influencing the strongest leverage points for transformative change. As long as institutions and power relations reinforce industrial agriculture through policies, subsidies, and markets while penalizing agroecological practices, most industrial farmers will not risk transitioning away from the dominant regime. Three case studies illustrate distinct pathways for agroecological transition.
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Why is industrial agriculture seemingly locked in'?
- 3 Agroecological transitions
- 4 A transdisciplinary perspective on agroecological transformation
- 5 Transforming food systems to be sustainable and just: lessons from Denmark, Brazil and Kenya
- 6 Conclusion
- 7 Where to look for further information
- 8 References