We're sorry. An error has occurred
Please cancel or retry.
Maimonides and St. Thomas on the Limits of Reason

Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
Couldn't load pickup availability
- Format:
-
01 July 1995

Shows that Maimonides and St. Thomas reached strikingly similar conclusions regarding the limits of reason and that these limits, in turn, show the dimensions of philosophical understanding.
Through a comparative philosophical examination of the diverse aporiae constituting the question of "providence," the author seeks to determine the degree of philosophical compatibility between Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas, and where disagreement is evident, its origin, nature and philosophical consequences. Dobbs-Weinstein retrieves some occluded aspects of their thought that render a better understanding of each thinker and provide a richer philosophical vocabulary for discussions of the limits of "reason," the consequent inevitable limits of language and interpretation and, above all, the relation between knowing and acting.
This study also shows how and why, despite the fact that they adopt some radically different ontological principles, Maimonides and Aquinas reach strikingly similar conclusions concerning the existential dimensions of human life, especially the possibilities and modes of knowledge and the actions consequent upon them.


"The book provides an important discussion of the agent intellect as conceived by Maimonides and by Aquinas. Dobbs-Weinstein does justice to both authors; her treatment is penetrating.
"It is a highly focused inquiry based on extensive study. While both Maimonides and Aquinas acknowledge a common intellectual tradition, their differing religious outlooks provide contrasting insights. The author makes them talk to one another and not past each other. The topics chosen for discussion are significant, not esoteric; they are issues confronted equally by medieval and contemporary moralists who subscribe to a Judaic or Christian belief system. Dobbs-Weinstein assists the reader by providing many accurate and helpful comparisons between the two." — Jude P. Dougherty, The Catholic University of America
Apologia and Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Introduction
1. Maimonides and Aquinas as Interpreters
The Development of Philosophical, Biblical Exegesis
Maimonides' and Aquinas' Approaches to Interpretation
Interpretation as a Philosophical Practice
2. The Book of Job
Early Approaches to the Book of Job
The Nature of the Inquiry
Maimonides' Account of Job
Aquinas' Exposition on Job
3. The Account of the Beginning or Creation
Introduction
Maimonides' Arguments for Creation
Aquinas' Arguments for Creation
4. Matter, Privation, and Evil
Introduction
Maimonides' Ambivalence Toward Matter
Aquinas' Understanding of Matter, Privation, and Evil
5. Natural Human Perfection and Its Limits
Introduction
The Nature of the Human Soul According to Maimonides
Aquinas and the Harmony of the Soul
Conclusion
6. Divine Law as a Perfection of Philosophical Ethics
Introduction
The Limits of Philosophical Ethics According to Maimonides
Divine Sanction as Universal Imperative
The Limits of Legislative Reason
The Displacement of Legislative Reason by Divine Law
Conclusion
7. Hubris, Knowledge, and Provident Participation
Introduction
The Problem of Job
Modes of Participating Providence
Conclusion: Excess and Reticence
Endnotes
Bibliography
Name Index
Subject Index